Oceana Sues to Get Bycatch Included in Fish Quotas

Oceana Sues to Get Bycatch Included in Fish Quotas

WASHINGTON, DC, November 1, 2011 (ENS) – The oceans advocacy group Oceana is suing the National Marine Fisheries Service based on the agency’s alleged failure to account for the catch of non-target fish and ocean wildlife in setting catch limits for Mid-Atlantic fisheries.

Oceana is asking the court to overturn the Omnibus Annual Catch Limit Amendment to the Magnuson-Stevens Act, approved earlier this year, which sets rules for fisheries from New York to North Carolina.

The amendment was originally intended to set scientifically-based annual catch limits and accountability measures for all 13 fish species managed in the region. But Oceana says the amendment falls far short of its goal.

“The Magnuson-Stevens Act, the law governing U.S. commercial fisheries, requires National Marine Fisheries Service to set limits on the number of fish caught regardless of whether or not the species is a target of the fishermen,” said Gib Brogan, Northeast representative for Oceana.

“Current methods completely ignore bycatch – the catch of non-target fish and ocean wildlife,” Brogan said. “Oceana believes that limits should be set for both target species and bycatch to ensure that fisheries are not taking too many fish out of the oceans.”

High value shrimp is separated from the bycatch. (Photo by Raymond Benedet)

National Marine Fisheries Service recently released its first U.S. National Bycatch Report, which shows that bycatch is rampant in the Mid-Atlantic. In general, the fisheries with the highest bycatch ratios were bottom trawl and bottom longline fisheries, the report states.

In the Mid-Atlantic trawl fishery, for instance, one pound of non-target fish is caught for every three pounds of fish being brought to shore.

“This bycatch is often thrown overboard, dead or dying and includes species that are specifically targeted by fishermen in other federal or state managed fisheries,” Oceana said in a statement.

The organization contends that fishery managers are failing to take into account the fish that are caught in multiple fisheries as target catch and bycatch.

And it’s not just fish bycatch that is a problem. The U.S. National Bycatch Report cites a 2009 study estimating that up to 3,187 marine mammals are caught annually for the period 1990-99. The NMFS’s own estimate is 1,887 animals die annually in nets as bycatch.

Saying that fisheries management requires high quality data about targeted catch and bycatch, Oceana is also taking aim at what it alleges is “the inadequate catch data collection program for these fisheries.”

“Across the Mid-Atlantic region, bycatch data collection and reporting is unacceptably spotty,” said Brogan. “Without accurate estimates of both target fish catch and bycatch, assessing whether catch limits have been followed is challenging to nearly impossible. Responsible fishing relies entirely on reliable data and monitoring.”

Oceana is “confident” that if this amendment is overturned, “a full analysis of the region’s fish catch, including bycatch, along with a critical analysis of data collection needs will improve the management of Mid-Atlantic fisheries.”

Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2011. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading