OLYMPIA, Washington, November 4, 2013 (ENS) – With one day before the election in Washington State, grassroots organization Food Democracy Now! is urging its 650,000 members and citizens everywhere to make calls urging voters to support Yes on 522, a ballot initiative that would require labeling of foods containing genetically modified organisms.
Initiative 522 is a measure before Washington voters on the November 5 ballot, requiring mandatory labeling of genetically engineered foods, seeds and seed products. These are foods that have genes from a different species inserted into their DNA, like a corn plant with genes from a bacterium.
Polls have shows that a majority of Washingtonians support the ballot initiative. If voters back the measure, Washington would be the first state to require GMO labeling with no strings attached.
Dave Murphy, founder and executive director of Food Democracy Now! a national grassroots movement of more than 650,000 farmers and citizens who support a sustainable food system said, “In the span of the past 12 months, voters in two states will have gone to the polls to win something so basic as the right to know what’s in their food.”
“During this time, the world’s largest chemical pesticide companies and giant food corporations have spent a combined total of $68 million dollars to hide the fact that 75 percent of the processed food in the U.S. has been genetically engineered in a laboratory and these companies make a huge profit by keeping Americans in the dark.”
Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson filed suit against the Grocery Manufacturers Association in Thurston County Superior Court on October 16, alleging that the GMA violated the state’s campaign disclosure laws when it collected and contributed more than $7 million to the “No on 522” campaign while shielding the identities of the companies donating that money.
The Attorney General demanded that the Grocery Manufacturers Association immediately comply with Washington law by registering as a political committee and filing the required disclosure reports listing its donors and amounts contributed.
In the lawsuit, he requested the court find the GMA in violation of the law, set an appropriate penalty for the GMA’s failure to comply with state disclosure laws, and order the GMA to pay the state’s attorneys’ fees and other related costs.
In response to the lawsuit, the GMA registered its political committee – Grocery Manufacturers Assn. Against I-522 – with the Public Disclosure Commission on October 18. The Grocery Manufacturers Association also produced information related to a portion of its members’ contributions on that day.
The GMA filed additional reports disclosing more of its members’ contributions on October 25 and 26. Lists of donors and the amounts they contributed can be found on the PDC website, here. Still, Attorney General Ferguson is continuing with the state’s lawsuit.
The largest donor to the “No on 522” campaign is Pepsico, with what the company calls its “22 iconic, billion-dollar brands.” Pepsico is followed by Nestle, Coca-Cola, General Mills, Conagra, Campbell Soup, Hersey’s and many others.
“Right now, these same giant corporations are busy spending a war chest of $22 million to once again deceive voters,” said Murphy. “Incredibly, Monsanto, Pepsi, Coke, Kraft, Kellogg’s and General Mills already label their products in 64 other countries around the world!”
The Grocery Manufacturers Association says, “The use of genetically modified ingredients is not only safe for people and our planet, but also has a number of important benefits.”
“GM technology adds desirable traits from nature, without introducing anything unnatural or using chemicals, so that food is more plentiful,” the grocery manufacturers state.
This technology is not new, the GMA says. “In fact, it has been around for the past 20 years, and today, 70-80 percent of the foods we eat in the United States, both at home and away from home, contain ingredients that have been genetically modified.”
“If the ingredient label on any food or beverage product contains corn or soy, they most likely contain genetically modified ingredients, as a very high percentage of those crops grown in the U.S. use GM technology. In addition, a high percentage of other ingredients in the U.S., such as sugar beets, are grown with the use of GM technology as well,” according to the GMA statement.
“Many of the most influential regulatory agencies and organizations that study the safety of the food supply, including the U.S. Food & Drug Administration, the American Medical Association, the World Health Organization, Health Canada, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the National Academy of Sciences, have found genetically modified food ingredients are safe and there are no negative health effects associated with their use,” says the GMA.
But Murphy and many other Washingtonians disagree. At the very least they want to know what their food contains.
“After spending $46 million to defeat Prop 37 in California, these same companies are now spending $22 million to kill labeling in Washington,” Murphy said. “The truth is, we all have the right to know what’s in our food and corporations who profit from selling food to us and our families do not have the right to hide that information from us.”
In the United States it is legal to label food products “natural” even if they contain genetically modified ingredients.
GMOs are banned or restricted in 30 other countries around the world, including Australia, Japan and all of the nations in the European Union. In the United States, however, consumers are not given GMO warning labels so they can decide for themselves if a risk exists and whether they are willing to accept it.
© 2013, . Environment News Service (ENS) © 2021 All Rights Reserved.