Climate Tipping Point Could Occur Sooner Than We Think

A researcher from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies surveys the bleached/dead corals at Zenith Reef,in the northern section of the Great Barrier Reef, November2016. (Photo by Andreas Dietzel)


NEW YORK, New York, January 23, 2019 (ENS) – A Columbia Engineering study, published today in the journal “Nature,” confirms the urgency of tackling climate change. Global carbon emissions reached a record high in 2018, rising by 3.4 percent in the United States alone, and oceans and forests are approaching their uptake limits.

As United Nations Secretary General António Guterres said at the opening of the 24th annual United Nations climate conference on December 3, 2018, “We are in deep trouble with climate change.”

While extreme weather events can affect the year-to-year variability in carbon uptake, and some researchers think there may be longer-term effects, this new study is the first to quantify the effects through the 21st century. It demonstrates that wetter-than-normal years do not compensate for losses in carbon uptake during dryer-than-normal years, caused by events such as droughts or heatwaves.

Emissions of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide, CO2, caused by human activities are increasing the concentration of CO2 in the Earth’s atmosphere and producing unnatural changes to the planet’s climate system. The effects of these emissions on global warming are only partially abated as the land and ocean absorb some of the CO2 emitted by humans burning fossil fuels.

A researcher from Queensland, Australia’s ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies surveys the bleached, dead corals at Zenith Reef, in the northern section of the Great Barrier Reef, November 2016. (Photo by Andreas Dietzel)

Currently, the oceans and forests and savannas on land are absorbing about 50 percent of these releases, explaining the bleaching of coral reefs and acidification of the ocean, as well as the increase of carbon uptake by forests.

“It is unclear, however, whether the land can continue to uptake anthropogenic emissions at the current rates,” says Pierre Gentine, associate professor of earth and environmental engineering and affiliated with the Earth Institute, who led the study.

“Should the land reach a maximum carbon uptake rate, global warming could accelerate, with important consequences for people and the environment. This means that we all really need to act now to avoid greater consequences of climate change,” Gentine said.

Gentine won a five-year $750,000 Early Career Research Program grant from the U.S. Department of Energy in 2015 for research on land‐atmosphere interactions and the role they play in weather and climate prediction.

Working with his PhD student Julia Green, Gentine wanted to understand how variability in the hydrological cycle – droughts and floods, and long-term drying trends – was affecting the capacity of the continents to trap some of the emissions of CO2.

The research is particularly timely as climate scientists have predicted that extreme events will likely increase in frequency and intensity in the future, some of which we are already witnessing today. They also predict that there will also be a change in rainfall patterns that will likely affect the ability of the Earth’s vegetation to take up carbon.

These big trees on California’s Shasta-Trinity National Forest will not be absorbing CO2 after this fire. April 26, 2018 (Photo by Liz Younger / U.S. Forest Service)

To define the amount of carbon stored in vegetation and soil, Gentine and Green analyzed net biome productivity, or NBP, defined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change as the net gain or loss of carbon from a region, equal to the net ecosystem production minus the carbon lost from disturbance like a forest fire or a forest harvest.

The researchers used data from four Earth System Models from the Global Land Atmosphere Coupling Experiment – Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (GLACE-CMIP5), to run a series of experiments to isolate reductions in NBP that are due strictly to changes in soil moisture.

They were able to isolate the effects of changes in long-term soil moisture trends, such as drying, as well as short-term variability, such as the effects of extreme events such as floods and droughts, on the ability of the land to take up carbon.

“We saw that the value of NBP, in this instance a net gain of carbon on the land surface, would actually be almost twice as high if it weren’t for these changes – variability and trend – in soil moisture,” says Green, the paper’s lead author.

“This is a big deal! exclaimed Green. “If soil moisture continues to reduce NBP at the current rate, and the rate of carbon uptake by the land starts to decrease by the middle of this century – as we found in the models – we could potentially see a large increase in the concentration of atmospheric CO2 and a corresponding rise in the effects of global warming and climate change.”

Gentine and Green note that soil-moisture variability reduces the present land carbon sink, and their results show that both variability and drying trends reduce it in the future.

Pierre Gentine, assistant professor of earth and environmental engineering at Columbia University. (Photo courtesy Columbia University)

By quantifying the critical importance of soil-water variability for the terrestrial carbon cycle, and the reduction in carbon uptake due to the effects of these changes in soil moisture, the study’s findings highlight the necessity of improved modeling of vegetation response to water stress and land-atmosphere coupling in Earth system models to better predict future climate conditions.

“Essentially, if there were no droughts and heat waves, if there were not going to be any long-term drying over the next century, then the continents would be able to store almost twice as much carbon as they do now,” said Gentine.

“Because soil moisture plays such a large role in the carbon cycle, in the ability of the land to uptake carbon, it’s essential that processes related to its representation in models become a top research priority,” he urged.

There is still a great deal of uncertainty on how plants respond to water stress, and so Green and Gentine will continue their work on improving representations of vegetation response to soil moisture changes.

They are now focusing on the tropics, a region with lots of unknowns, and the largest terrestrial carbon sink, to determine how vegetation activity is being controlled by both changes in soil moisture as well as atmospheric dryness.

“This study is highly valuable as it shines a bright spotlight on just how important water is for the uptake of carbon by the biosphere,” said Chris Schwalm, an associate scientist at Woods Hole Research Center and an expert in global environmental change, carbon cycle sensitivity and modeling frameworks who was not involved in the study.

“It also exposes underdeveloped aspects of Earth system modeling such as processes related to vegetation water-stress and soil moisture,” explained Schwalm, “which can be targeted during model development for better predictive capacity in the context of global environmental change.”

Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2019. All rights reserved.


Continue Reading